Question 1
Who may delegate certification authority for requirements valued less than what amount?
Correct Answer:
Less than $100,000
Explanation:
The concept being tested is how delegation of certification authority is used to streamline small purchases while keeping tighter control on larger ones. In this framework, the ability to certify that a requirement is properly reviewed and ready for award can be delegated to a suitable official, but this delegation is limited by dollar value. Specifically, for requirements valued less than 100,000 dollars, the contracting officer can delegate certification authority to a qualified designee. This means lower-dollar, lower-risk procurements can move more quickly through the process without burdening the contracting officer with every small decision. Why this threshold matters: when the value stays under 100k, the risk and potential impact are relatively lower, so delegating certifying duties helps keep procurement-moving efficiently. Once the value exceeds that threshold, the governance and accountability requirements tighten up, and the delegation to a lower-level official is not appropriate—the contracting officer or a higher-level official must handle certification responsibilities to maintain proper oversight.
Question 2
How are GFP adjustments handled during contract administration?
Correct Answer:
By an equitable adjustment under the contract.
Explanation:
Adjustments involving Government Furnished Property during contract administration are handled as an equitable adjustment under the contract. When GFP availability or characteristics affect costs, performance, or schedule, the contractor requests a modification to the contract terms—typically a price adjustment, a schedule change, or both—through the contract’s established adjustment mechanisms (often tied to the Changes clause and the Government Property provisions). This approach keeps the remedy within the contract framework, ensuring fair compensation for additional costs or time caused by GFP changes, rather than pursuing a separate procurement action or acting outside the contract.
Question 3
Threshold and approval for D&F for 'Other than full and open competitions for International Agreement competitive restriction'
Correct Answer:
>$0 CoCO
Explanation:
When you use a contract action that is “Other than full and open competition” because of an International Agreement competitive restriction, you must have a Determination and Findings (D&F) to justify the noncompetitive approach. The important point is that the need for a D&F here isn’t about hitting a dollar threshold; it’s about whether the action is noncompetitive due to an international constraint. In this scenario, any positive contract value requires the D&F to be approved by the appropriate authority (CoCO). Therefore, the threshold is simply greater than zero with CoCO approval. The other options imply specific dollar floors or additional authorities that aren’t the standard for this situation.
Question 4
Issuing a letter authorizing expenditures before funds are available would be anti-deficient.
Correct Answer:
True
Explanation:
The government cannot incur or authorize expenditures before funds are actually available. This is prohibited by the Anti-Deficiency Act, which requires obligations to be supported by appropriations or other available budget authority. A letter that commits the government to spend money when no funds exist would bind the government to incur a cost without budget authority, creating an improper, anti-deficient obligation. In practice, you must wait for funds to be appropriated or otherwise made available, or rely on a specific statutory authority that explicitly allows an advance or emergency action.
Question 5
Which regulations govern ratification of unauthorized commitments?
Correct Answer:
FAR 1.602-3 and AFARS 5101.602-3
Explanation:
The key idea is that ratification of unauthorized commitments is governed by the general contracting rules in the FAR, with Army-specific procedures provided by the Army Supplement. Specifically, the rules for ratifying an unauthorized commitment are found in FAR 1.602-3, which lays out the conditions, approvals, and process a contracting officer must follow to ratify such commitments. The Army-specific implementation of those rules is in AFARS 5101.602-3, which adapts the FAR requirements to Army contracting, including who can approve ratifications and the Army’s particular documentation and funding steps. That combination is why this option is correct: FAR 1.602-3 provides the baseline standards for ratification, and AFARS 5101.602-3 provides the Army-specific procedures to carry them out. The other choices don’t fit because DoD Instruction 5000 and DoDI 5000 cover broad DoD acquisition policies rather than the specific process for ratifying unauthorized commitments. AFARS 5102-4 and FAR 1.603 don’t address the ratification process in the same targeted way as 1.602-3 and 5101.602-3.
Question 1
Exam overview

About this Exam

Prepare with the USACE Contracting Officer Review Board (CORB) Practice Test practice quiz. This question bank includes 10 questions covering contract, threshold, delegate, usace, and contracting. Use it to review important concepts, identify knowledge gaps, and build confidence for the related exam, course, or assessment.

More details

Additional Information

USACE Contracting Officer Review Board (CORB) Practice Test

This practice set contains 10 questions from the matching question bank and focuses on contract, threshold, delegate, usace, and contracting. Work through each question carefully, review the provided solutions, and revisit topics that need more study before your next attempt.

This is an independent study resource intended for practice and review; it is not an official examination or an endorsement by any organization named in the title.

Quiz information

Frequently Asked Questions

The complete question count is available after full access is unlocked.
No fixed duration is currently configured for this quiz.
Question explanations are included where they are available in the quiz content, helping you review the reasoning after answering.
Yes. You can retake the practice test again as you continue studying during your available access period.
After your access is confirmed, you can continue into the complete practice exam from this quiz flow.
Unless explicitly stated otherwise, this page provides independent practice material for study and exam preparation and is not the official examination itself.
Keep studying

Related Questions