Question 1
Which statement accurately describes a summary judgment?
Correct Answer:
It is a judgment without a trial where there is no real prospect of success for the other side.
Explanation:
Summary judgment is a court decision made without a full trial when there are no genuine disputes over material facts and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. This matches the idea that the case can be resolved without trial because there is no real prospect of success for the other side. In practice, a party shows through evidence—such as affidavits, depositions, and documents—that all essential facts are undisputed, and the law will decide the outcome given those facts. If a reasonable person could not differ on the result, the court grants judgment on the legal issues, either for all claims or for specific issues. It’s a civil procedure tool, not limited to criminal cases, and it doesn’t require both sides’ consent. If genuine issues remain, the motion is denied and the case proceeds to trial.
Question 2
Post-Brexit, for service within the EU after 1 January 2021, which statement is correct?
Correct Answer:
Both the claim was made before 1 January 2021 and the contract contains an English jurisdiction clause
Explanation:
After Brexit, you don’t automatically have a right to serve a claim in another EU member state. The general rule is that you must obtain permission from the English court to serve out of the jurisdiction. The only scenario where you can avoid that extra step is when two conditions are all met at once: the claim was issued before 1 January 2021, and the contract contains an English jurisdiction clause. In that narrow case, the pre-Brexit service framework can be used for service within the EU without a separate court order, because it fits the transitional arrangements preserved for those older proceedings. If either condition isn’t met, you’ll typically need the court’s permission to serve in the EU, or you’d rely on other routes such as the Hague service conventions.
Question 3
Where is the High Court located?
Correct Answer:
The Central Office of the High Court is located inside the Royal Courts of Justice in London
Explanation:
The main idea is where the High Court sits and where its central administration is housed. The High Court’s main seat is in London, at the Royal Courts of Justice on the Strand. The Central Office, which handles the High Court’s administration, is located inside that same building in London. So the location being tested is London, specifically within the Royal Courts of Justice. The other cities—Leeds, Birmingham, and Manchester—are not the High Court’s location.
Question 4
Cost budgeting is especially relevant for which track?
Correct Answer:
Multi-track.
Explanation:
Cost budgeting is the process of forecasting and controlling the legal costs of a case so that expenses stay proportional to what is at issue and to what the court considers reasonable. It matters most in the multi-track because those cases are typically longer, more complex, and involve more steps (disclosure, expert evidence, longer trials). With that complexity comes higher and more unpredictable costs, so the courts require budgets to help manage expectations and keep costs in check. In contrast, the small claims track is designed to be quick and inexpensive and usually doesn’t involve the formal budgeting process, and appeals follow a different cost framework. So the track where cost budgeting is standardly and most relevant is the multi-track.
Question 5
For a partnership defendant, service may be left with which of the following?
Correct Answer:
A partner or a person who, at the time of service, has control or management of the partnership business at its principal place of business
Explanation:
Notice to a partnership must be given to someone who can legally receive service on behalf of the firm. The proper recipients include a partner or a person who, at the time of service, has control or management of the partnership's business at its principal place of business. This ensures the partnership actually receives notice and the court has jurisdiction. A random employee is not authorized to accept service on behalf of the partnership, and the landlord is not typically a designated recipient unless acting in a controlling role within the partnership. Therefore, service on a partner or on someone who is in control or management at the principal place of business best captures who may be served.
Question 1
Exam overview

About this Exam

Prepare with the SQE 1 – Dispute Resolution Commencing Proceedings Practice Test practice quiz. This question bank includes 10 questions covering judgment, service, claims, dispute, and resolution. Use it to review important concepts, identify knowledge gaps, and build confidence for the related exam, course, or assessment.

More details

Additional Information

SQE 1 – Dispute Resolution Commencing Proceedings Practice Test

This practice set contains 10 questions from the matching question bank and focuses on judgment, service, claims, dispute, and resolution. Work through each question carefully, review the provided solutions, and revisit topics that need more study before your next attempt.

This is an independent study resource intended for practice and review; it is not an official examination or an endorsement by any organization named in the title.

Quiz information

Frequently Asked Questions

The complete question count is available after full access is unlocked.
No fixed duration is currently configured for this quiz.
Question explanations are included where they are available in the quiz content, helping you review the reasoning after answering.
Yes. You can retake the practice test again as you continue studying during your available access period.
After your access is confirmed, you can continue into the complete practice exam from this quiz flow.
Unless explicitly stated otherwise, this page provides independent practice material for study and exam preparation and is not the official examination itself.
Keep studying

Related Questions