The main idea here is evaluating actions by their consequences to maximize overall welfare. Utilitarian ethics asks which action will produce the most happiness or least suffering for the greatest number of people, so the right choice is the one that raises total well-being, not merely adheres to rules or reflects a particular character. This framework focuses on outcomes and the sum of benefits and harms across everyone affected. Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill argued that we should aim to maximize utility, often framed as happiness or welfare, and sometimes weighed through a form of cost-benefit reasoning to determine the best overall result. Other ethical approaches emphasize different anchors. Rights-based ethics centers on respecting fundamental rights regardless of total happiness. Justice ethics concentrates on fair distribution and equity, sometimes prioritizing fairness over sheer aggregate welfare. Virtue ethics focuses on the character and virtues of the person acting rather than the consequences of a specific action. Because utilitarianism is defined by its outcome-driven aim to maximize the greatest good for the greatest number, it best fits the described criterion.