Separating a dependent clause from the preceding element with proper punctuation creates a natural pause and stops the sentence from running on. Here, putting a comma after the word photography gives a clear break before the reason clause introduced by because, so the sentence reads as a lead-in followed by an explanatory clause. This punctuation choice aligns with how we handle a noun or short phrase that precedes a reason clause, keeping the meaning intact and the sentence smooth. The other options either remove the necessary pause, use punctuation (like a semicolon) in a way that doesn’t fit a dependent clause, or contain a typographical error (digitalphotography) that breaks the word.

Choosing the right relative pronoun to introduce a clause about people. In this sentence, the clause that follows describes anyone, and within that clause the verb has experienced needs a subject. That subject is the relative pronoun. Since the subject refers to a person, who is the natural choice. Whom would only be correct if the pronoun were the object of a verb inside the clause, which isn’t the case here. Which is used for things or ideas, not people. That can be used for people in informal speech, but who is preferred in standard English when referring to people. So, who fits best, making the sentence read: anyone who has experienced adolescence or parenting.

The main idea here is to cut wordiness by using a direct causal connector instead of a verbose phrase. Replacing “Due to the fact that” with a simple “Because” keeps the cause and effect clear while trimming unnecessary words. So the strongest corrected sentence is: Because the meeting ran late, we were unable to finish the agenda. It preserves meaning and reads smoothly, with proper punctuation after the introductory clause. The other approaches either feel choppier or introduce a grammar issue. A version that uses a semicolon is technically correct, but it can read a bit abruptly because it splits the thought into two independent clauses. Repeating the original structure exactly leaves the sentence still verbose. A version that uses a comma to join two independent clauses would be incorrect (a comma splice).

The main idea is pronoun case after a preposition. After a preposition like between, you need an object-form pronoun. In this sentence, the phrase goes with two groups in a relationship: us humans and those other life forms. “Between” requires the pronoun in its objective case, so the natural, correct form is us. Using we would be wrong here because we is the subject form, not the object form, and the sentence isn’t about the humans doing the action but about the relationship between the two groups. I is ruled out for the same reason, and they would need to be the object “them” if you were to use a different pronoun. That’s why the best choice is us.