Register
Question 1
What is the self-destruct time for the FIM-92 Stinger?
Correct Answer:
15-19 seconds
Explanation:
The self-destruct time for the FIM-92 Stinger is accurately set at 15-19 seconds. This timeframe is critical in ensuring that the missile does not pose a long-term threat in the event it is unable to successfully engage its intended target. The self-destruct mechanism is designed to activate after the missile has traveled for a period of time without acquiring a target, effectively mitigating risks associated with unexploded ordnance and enhancing safety in operational environments. This specific time range helps balance the capabilities of the weapon with safety measures. Should the missile not lock onto a target quickly, the self-destruct feature minimizes the risk of a stray missile causing unintended harm. Understanding this mechanic is essential for operators and military planners, as it informs both tactics and responses when deploying the Stinger system.
Question 2
What is the nomenclature for the HEAT rocket?
Correct Answer:
HEAT 551C RS
Explanation:
The nomenclature for the HEAT rocket is correctly identified as HEAT 551C RS. This designation reflects the specific type of high-explosive anti-tank (HEAT) rocket, which is engineered to penetrate armored vehicles using a shaped charge. The "HEAT" part of the nomenclature stands for High-Explosive Anti-Tank, indicating its primary function. The number "551" is a unique identifier for this specific model, and the "C RS" designation may refer to additional specifications or configurations for the rocket system. Understanding the full nomenclature is crucial for effective communication in military contexts, ensuring that personnel are aware of the specific capabilities and applications of the weapon. Other options provided do not relate to the HEAT rocket or fall under different categories of ordnance, such as illumination or different classes of munitions.
Question 3
In what type of combat scenario is the Javelin most effective?
Correct Answer:
Urban warfare
Explanation:
The Javelin anti-tank missile system is designed to be particularly effective in urban warfare scenarios due to several factors inherent in its capabilities. Urban environments often feature a mix of structures, vehicles, and obstacles that can provide cover and concealment for both friendly forces and enemy armor. The Javelin's advanced targeting system, which includes an infrared seeker and the ability to lock onto targets both before and after launch, allows for precise targeting even in cluttered environments. Additionally, the Javelin is equipped with a top-attack flight profile, which is especially advantageous when targeting armored vehicles in urban settings. Many modern tanks and armored vehicles have weaker armor on their upper surfaces, making the top-attack feature of the Javelin a critical component of its effectiveness. In urban warfare, the ability to engage targets from concealed positions while maintaining a safe distance from enemy fire is paramount, and the Javelin provides that capability. While the system can be utilized in various combat scenarios, its specific design and features, such as ease of operation and effectiveness against armored threats, make it particularly suited for the complexities and challenges presented in urban combat.
Question 4
What are the max effective ranges for the M72 LAW?
Correct Answer:
200m stationary, 165m moving
Explanation:
The M72 Light Anti-Tank Weapon (LAW) is designed for short-range engagements against armored vehicles and fortifications. Its maximum effective range is critical for operators to understand in order to maximize the weapon's effectiveness in combat scenarios. The range parameters indicate that the weapon can effectively engage targets up to 200 meters when the operator is stationary, and 165 meters when moving. This range is reflective of the design and intended use of the M72 LAW, which focuses on portability and ease of use in various combat situations. Engaging targets at longer distances would generally decrease accuracy and effectiveness, especially when operating under combat conditions where the risk of movement and environmental factors come into play. Understanding these effective ranges helps users to ensure they remain within operational limits to maintain a high probability of hit on the target.
Question 5
The TPT and smoke rockets are ballistically similar to which other rocket?
Correct Answer:
HE
Explanation:
The TPT (Tandem Penetrator Target) and smoke rockets are ballistically similar to high explosive (HE) rockets due to the characteristics of their flight dynamics and performance profiles. Both types of rockets are designed to function effectively when launched, possessing similar aerodynamic properties that influence their trajectories and range. Ballistic similarity implies that the rockets share comparable trajectories under similar conditions, meaning they will behave similarly in terms of speed, range, and altitude during flight. This is crucial for operators who may need to predict the behavior of different rocket types when engaged in tactical scenarios. High explosive rockets, meaning those filled with explosive material designed to produce a significant blast effect, share these flight characteristics with TPT and smoke rockets, making them important companions in terms of tactical planning and deployment for ground troops. The other types of rockets listed, such as HEAT (High-Explosive Anti-Tank), ADM (Anti-Drone Munition), and illumination rockets, have distinct operational purposes and structural designs that affect their ballistics differently compared to TPT and smoke rockets. Therefore, they do not exhibit the same ballistic similarities as HE rockets do with TPT and smoke types.
Question 1
Exam overview

About this Exam

The 18B Anti-Tank (AT) qualification is a demanding technical certification designed exclusively for U.S. Army Special Forces Weapons Sergeants, commonly known as Green Berets with the Military Occupational Specialty (MOS) 18B. These elite soldiers are recognized as the primary weapons specialists within a 12-man Special Forces Operational Detachment-Alpha (SFODA), capable of operating, maintaining, and instructing on an exhaustive array of U.S., allied, and foreign high-density light and heavy weaponry.

The 18B Anti-Tank qualification specifically validates a Weapons Sergeant's advanced proficiency in a critical combat domain: countering and defeating armored threats. It is not merely a course on how to pull a trigger; rather, it assesses a candidate's comprehensive ability to technically analyze, tactically employ, and logistically support specialized anti-armor systems in complex, high-stakes operational environments, both conventional and unconventional. This certification ensures that 18Bs possess the precision and lethal knowledge required to dominate the anti-tank battle.

More details

Additional Information

What the Course Entails and Exam Details

The path to 18B Anti-Tank certification involves a rigorous curriculum that blends intense theoretical study with hands-on, realistic application. As a practice test, this tool simulates the critical components of that qualification. The comprehensive curriculum covers the following core topics and skill areas:

  • Advanced Anti-Armor Weapon Systems: In-depth study of the technical specifications, operating procedures, and firing sequences for specialized anti-tank guided missiles (ATGMs) and recoilless rifles. Specific systems often include, but are not limited to, the FGM-148 Javelin, the AT4 family, and the 84mm Carl Gustaf Recoilless Multi-Purpose Weapon System (M3A1).

  • Armored Vehicle Identification and Vulnerability Analysis: A critical component involving the immediate visual identification of diverse modern main battle tanks (MBTs) and armored fighting vehicles (AFVs). This includes a granular analysis of specific armor types, internal component layouts, and known vulnerabilities (e.g., top attack vs. direct fire) to optimize engagement effectiveness.

  • Tactical Position and Engagement Protocols: The selection, preparation, and occupation of optimal firing positions for anti-tank teams. Candidates must demonstrate the ability to calculate proper fields of fire, implement camouflage and concealment, establish alternative positions, and execute effective engagement tactics based on vehicle type and movement patterns.

  • Maintenance, Troubleshooting, and Ammunition Management: Comprehensive protocols for operator-level maintenance, diagnostic troubleshooting of technical malfunctions, and the safe handling, transport, and storage of diverse anti-armor munitions and their associated complex firing systems.

  • Integration of Anti-Armor Fires: The tactical synchronization of specialized anti-tank assets with wider organic and supporting firepower, including direct and indirect fire systems, call for fire, and emergency close air support.


What to Expect in the Final Exam

For an aspiring 18B Weapons Sergeant, the final assessment for the anti-tank qualification is a multi-phased and high-stakes evaluation embedded within the Special Forces Qualification Course (SFQC). The 'exam' is designed to evaluate total competency. Candidates can expect:

  1. Technical Written Examination: This phase is a rigorous, time-limited, computer-based assessment consisting of 50-100 multiple-choice and complex calculation questions. It is a 'no-holds-barred' test of technical recall, assessing knowledge of maximum and minimum engagement ranges, arming times, backblast areas, magnification levels of integrated optics, and specific armor-piercing capabilities for each covered weapon system. This written component is what a practice test, such as this one, directly simulates.

  2. Practical Application Evaluation: Following the written test, candidates must demonstrate hands-on mastery in a series of 'go/no-go' practical evaluations. This includes performing complete functions checks, demonstrating proper loading and unloading sequences, simulating misfire procedures under pressure, and executing full firing-to-reload sequences within specific time limits.

  3. Tactical Live-Fire and Field Exercise: The final, culminating phase is often a live-fire event or a complex field tactical scenario. Candidates are integrated into a mock SFODA, tasked with planning and executing an anti-armor mission against a realistic target. This evaluates their ability to lead an anti-tank team, select positions, coordinate fires, and effectively engage moving or stationary targets using the appropriate weapon system and tactics, all while under simulated combat stress. A passing score requires precision, adherence to safety protocols, and successful tactical resolution.


How to Study and Exam Centers

Preparation for the 18B Anti-Tank qualification must be methodical and realistic, reflecting the high standards expected in the Special Forces. Here are actionable study strategies:

  • Utilize Technical Manuals (TMs): The official U.S. Army Technical Manuals for each weapon system are the bedrock of technical knowledge. Study them exhaustively, focusing on chapters covering specifications, operating procedures, maintenance, and ammunition. Pay special attention to 'Warning,' 'Caution,' and 'Note' sections.

  • Master Vehicle Identification (VID): Create dynamic flashcard sets (physical or digital) featuring diverse armored vehicles from multiple angles and in varied camouflage. Practice immediate identification, noting key features like turret shape, road wheel count, and known weak points.

  • Simulate Realistic Firing Scenarios: When using the practice test, do not just select answers. Instead, actively read each scenario and mentally visualize yourself on a range. Imagine setting up the Javelin or Carl Gustaf, adjusting the sight, calculating range, and executing the firing sequence. This cognitive load helps internalize technical procedures.

  • Collaborate and Teach: Group study with peers is invaluable. Quiz each other on specifications and tactically review past exercises. Attempting to explain a system's operation or a tactical principle to others is one of the most effective ways to solidify your own understanding.

Exam Centers: The final qualification for the 18B Anti-Tank component occurs only at specific U.S. Army special warfare installations, primarily within the U.S. Army John F. Kennedy Special Warfare Center and School (USAJFKSWCS) at Fort Liberty, North Carolina, and its associated high-tech training areas and live-fire ranges. The registration and scheduling are part of the broader SFQC pipeline.


Job Opportunities from the Course

A successful 18B Anti-Tank qualification is not a standalone credential; rather, it is a key technical milestone that unlocks advanced Special Forces career paths. By mastering these critical skills, a Weapons Sergeant becomes an indispensable asset for an SFODA. Career paths and specific job titles include:

  • 18B Special Forces Weapons Sergeant

  • SF Detachment Senior Weapons Sergeant

  • Anti-Armor/Heavy Weapons Instructor (USAJFKSWCS)

  • Unconventional Warfare Tactical Advisor (focus on anti-armor assets)

  • Special Operations Target Interdiction Course (SOTIC) Instructor (advanced ballistics applications)

  • Special Forces Warrant Officer (180A) (with subsequent selection and training)

Quiz information

Frequently Asked Questions

The complete question count is available after full access is unlocked.
No fixed duration is currently configured for this quiz.
Question explanations are included where they are available in the quiz content, helping you review the reasoning after answering.
Yes. You can retake the practice test again as you continue studying during your available access period.
After your access is confirmed, you can continue into the complete practice exam from this quiz flow.
Unless explicitly stated otherwise, this page provides independent practice material for study and exam preparation and is not the official examination itself.