Cengage Computer Forensics Practice Test

Access More Questions
Which of the following is most appropriate for validating that two copies of evidence are identical?
Correct Answer:
Compute and compare cryptographic hashes of both copies
Explanation:
The idea being tested is data integrity verification through cryptographic hashing. You validate that two copies of evidence are identical by computing a cryptographic hash of each copy and then comparing the resulting digests. A hash function takes the entire content and produces a fixed-size digest; even a tiny change in the data yields a vastly different hash. Because hash values are highly sensitive to any modification, matching hashes provide strong assurance that the copies are identical, which is essential for maintaining integrity in forensic work. Use a strong hash function (such as SHA-256) and apply it to the complete image data on both copies, then compare the results. Relying on file names is unreliable because names can be renamed or duplicated without affecting the underlying data. Judging by appearance is misleading since tampering can be subtle and invisible to the eye. Imaging date alone does not reflect content integrity, as two different images could share the same date or be altered without changing the date.

Access more questions from this quiz

Continue to Cengage Computer Forensics Practice Test for more practice questions and the full quiz experience.

Access More Questions