Categories
All Categories
DMV
ServSafe
OSHA
NCLEX
HESI
TEAS
ATI Nursing
CNA & Nurse Aide
NREMT & EMS
ACLS
BLS
CPR
Quizzes
Study Guides
Flashcards
Packages
0
Log In
Register
Categories
All Categories
DMV
ServSafe
OSHA
NCLEX
HESI
TEAS
Quizzes
Study Guides
Flashcards
Packages
Contact
Cart
0
Log In
Register
Corporations Bar Practice Exam
Access More Questions
Report question problem
×
I think the answer is wrong
There are multiple correct answers
There is a typing error
Image or comprehension text is not display properly
Something else(please specify below)
Any more information
What requirement is NOT necessary for bringing a shareholder derivative suit?
Contemporaneous stock ownership
Adequate representation of the corporation's interests
Owner must hold at least 10% of shares
Making demand on directors before suit
Reveal Answer
Correct Answer:
Owner must hold at least 10% of shares
Explanation:
In a derivative suit, shareholders bring action on behalf of the corporation to address harms that have been done to the corporation itself, typically due to the actions of its directors or officers. The requirement regarding ownership is that the shareholder must have owned shares either at the time of the alleged wrongful acts or must have acquired them by operation of law (for example, through inheritance or stock transfer). Therefore, while it's common for states to have threshold requirements regarding the percentage of shares owned, there is no universal requirement that a shareholder must hold at least 10% of the shares to initiate a derivative suit. The other requirements are essential to sustain a derivative action. Contemporaneous stock ownership ensures that the shareholder bringing the suit has a vested interest in the corporation's well-being at the time of the alleged wrongdoing. Adequate representation of the corporation's interests by the shareholder is crucial because the suit is fundamentally meant to benefit the corporation, not the individual shareholder. Furthermore, making a demand on the directors before filing a suit is often necessary to give the board the opportunity to address the issue themselves, thereby respecting the corporate governance structure. Thus, the absence of a mandated minimum ownership percentage of 10% for bringing a derivative suit accurately identifies why that choice is
Access more questions from this quiz
Continue to Corporations Bar Practice Exam for more practice questions and the full quiz experience.
Access More Questions