What describes the Supreme Court's ruling in Mapp ...

Western Governors University (WGU) POLS1030 C963 American Politics And The US Constitution Pre Assesment Practice

Question Number 5

What describes the Supreme Court's ruling in Mapp v. Ohio?

Evidence obtained without a warrant that does not fall under the exception rule is admissible Evidence obtained with a warrant is always admissible Evidence obtained without a warrant that is related to national security may be admissible Evidence obtained without a warrant that does not fall under the exception rule is not admissible

✔ Correct Answer:

Evidence obtained without a warrant that does not fall under the exception rule is not admissible

Western Governors University (WGU) POLS1030 C963 American Politics And The US Constitution Pre Assesment Practice

Question Number 5

Count Down:

Related questions :