CT Bar Practice Questions - Connecticut Bar Examination Exam

Access More Questions

Two parties enter a written contract that appears complete and final on its face. One party seeks to introduce evidence of a prior oral agreement that contradicts a term in the writing. Under the parol evidence rule, is the evidence admissible?

No, prior or contemporaneous evidence contradicting a fully integrated writing is generally inadmissible to vary its terms Yes, because oral agreements always override written ones Yes, because the parol evidence rule applies only to sales of goods No, because all extrinsic evidence is barred even to show fraud

Correct Answer:

No, prior or contemporaneous evidence contradicting a fully integrated writing is generally inadmissible to vary its terms

Access more questions from this quiz

Continue to CT Bar Practice Questions - Connecticut Bar Examination Exam for more practice questions and the full quiz experience.

Access More Questions