Luiss Master's Admission Test Practice Questions - Luiss Admission Test For Master's Degree Courses (Luiss Guido Carli University) Exam

Access More Questions

Premise 1: All compliance officers must audit quarterly financial reports. Premise 2: Marco is a compliance officer. Conclusion: Marco must audit quarterly financial reports. Which of the following best describes the logical validity of the statement above?

The argument is deductively valid because the conclusion follows necessarily from the premises. The argument is invalid because Marco might be on medical leave during the audit. The argument is inductive because it relies on Marco's specific job description. The argument commits the fallacy of affirming the consequent.

Correct Answer:

The argument is deductively valid because the conclusion follows necessarily from the premises.

Access more questions from this quiz

Continue to Luiss Master's Admission Test Practice Questions - Luiss Admission Test for Master's Degree Courses (Luiss Guido Carli University) Exam for more practice questions and the full quiz experience.

Access More Questions