PEB Legal Framework For IP Protection Practice Questions - Patent Examination Board - Legal Framework For The Protection Of Intellectual Property (Group 1) Exam

Access More Questions

In the landmark Appellate Division judgment of Schultz v Butt 1986 (3) SA 667 (A), what specific conduct was held to constitute unlawful competition?

Using a competitor's original product directly as a physical mould (plug) to replicate and sell competing items. Lawfully purchasing a competitor's product and analyzing its functional measurements for reverse engineering. Filing a trade mark application for a descriptive geographic name. Hiring a competitor's former employee who possessed general industry skill and experience.

Correct Answer:

Using a competitor's original product directly as a physical mould (plug) to replicate and sell competing items.

Access more questions from this quiz

Continue to PEB Legal Framework for IP Protection Practice Questions - Patent Examination Board - Legal Framework for the Protection of Intellectual Property (Group 1) Exam for more practice questions and the full quiz experience.

Access More Questions