ND Bar Practice Questions - North Dakota Bar Examination Exam

Access More Questions

A taxpayer sues in federal court to challenge a federal program, asserting only generalized harm shared by all taxpayers. The government moves to dismiss for lack of standing. Under Article III standing doctrine, how should the court rule?

No standing, because a generalized taxpayer grievance is not a concrete, particularized injury, subject to the narrow Establishment Clause exception Standing exists, because every taxpayer has a stake in how tax dollars are spent Standing exists, because the case raises an important constitutional question No standing, because only Congress may challenge federal spending

Correct Answer:

No standing, because a generalized taxpayer grievance is not a concrete, particularized injury, subject to the narrow Establishment Clause exception

Access more questions from this quiz

Continue to ND Bar Practice Questions - North Dakota Bar Examination Exam for more practice questions and the full quiz experience.

Access More Questions