Torts Multistate Bar Examination (MBE) Practice Test

Access More Questions
A swimmer at a private lake resort is within a roped-in swimming area but leaves the rope area to reach a volleyball game. The lifeguard on duty sees the swimmer but does not warn him to return. Is the lifeguard liable for any injuries the swimmer sustains?
Correct Answer:
No, because the swimmer knowingly left the roped area.
Explanation:
The key idea is the scope of a lifeguard’s duty. A lifeguard is responsible for supervising and protecting swimmers within the designated swimming area. If a swimmer voluntarily leaves that area, the lifeguard’s duty to warn or supervise the swimmer in that context generally ends because the risk now lies outside the protected zone and the swimmer has assumed it. Here, the swimmer knowingly stepped out of the roped area to join a volleyball game, and the lifeguard did not warn him to return. Since the swimmer left the safe zone, the lifeguard’s failure to warn does not breach a duty. The injuries occurred outside the lifeguard’s duty-bound area, so there’s no liability. Choosing a broader duty to supervise all swimmers or a broader duty to warn those outside the area would be inaccurate; the duty is tied to the designated safe zone, and the swimmer’s voluntary departure ends that specific duty. If the swimmer had stayed inside and the lifeguard failed to warn or protect him, that could be different.

Access more questions from this quiz

Continue to Torts Multistate Bar Examination (MBE) Practice Test for more practice questions and the full quiz experience.

Access More Questions