CT Bar Practice Questions - Connecticut Bar Examination Exam

Access More Questions

A suspect in custody is interrogated by police without being advised of his rights. He makes an incriminating statement. Under Miranda v. Arizona, what is the consequence?

The statement is always admissible regardless of warnings Miranda applies only to written confessions The statement is generally inadmissible in the prosecution's case-in-chief because the suspect was not given Miranda warnings before custodial interrogation Miranda warnings are required only after indictment

Correct Answer:

The statement is generally inadmissible in the prosecution's case-in-chief because the suspect was not given Miranda warnings before custodial interrogation

Access more questions from this quiz

Continue to CT Bar Practice Questions - Connecticut Bar Examination Exam for more practice questions and the full quiz experience.

Access More Questions