WA Bar Practice Questions - Washington Bar Examination (NextGen UBE) Exam

Access More Questions

A police officer interrogates a suspect in custody without first giving Miranda warnings, and the suspect makes incriminating statements. The prosecution seeks to use the statements in its case-in-chief. What is the most likely result?

The statements are admissible because Miranda applies only at trial The statements are admissible because the officer acted in good faith The statements are admissible if the suspect was guilty The statements are generally inadmissible in the prosecution's case-in-chief because of the Miranda violation

Correct Answer:

The statements are generally inadmissible in the prosecution's case-in-chief because of the Miranda violation

Access more questions from this quiz

Continue to WA Bar Practice Questions - Washington Bar Examination (NextGen UBE) Exam for more practice questions and the full quiz experience.

Access More Questions