A To Z Grant Writing Practice Test

Access More Questions
Why is alignment among theory of change, logic model, planned activities, and evaluation critical?
Correct Answer:
It ensures coherence, credibility of the approach, and a feasible evaluation strategy.
Explanation:
Alignment among theory of change, logic model, planned activities, and evaluation creates a single, testable pathway from investment to impact. The theory of change explains why the program should work and the assumptions that must hold for change to occur. The logic model translates that narrative into a practical plan, showing how resources and activities produce outputs and, ultimately, outcomes. Planned activities are the concrete actions you’ll carry out with those resources to generate those outputs. The evaluation plan then specifies what data to collect and how to determine whether the outcomes occurred, providing evidence about whether the theory held up in practice. When these elements fit together, the proposal presents a coherent, credible, and feasible path to success, making it easier to justify the budget, timeline, and expected results to funders. If they don’t align, the chain breaks: activities may not lead to the intended outcomes, or the evaluation may be unable to demonstrate impact, which undermines credibility and learning.

Access more questions from this quiz

Continue to A to Z Grant Writing Practice Test for more practice questions and the full quiz experience.

Access More Questions