OAB 2a Fase Practice Questions - OAB Exame De Ordem Unificado - 2a Fase (Prova Prático-Profissional) Exam

Access More Questions

A plaintiff files a collection lawsuit (Ação de Cobrança) against a debtor. The defendant is properly served and retains you to draft the defense. In reviewing the complaint, you notice that the debt became enforceable 6 years ago, surpassing the 5-year statutory period under Art. 206, § 5º, I, of the Brazilian Civil Code, and the plaintiff failed to include mandatory proof of payment demands. In drafting the Contestação (Answer), how should these arguments be structured?

Preliminary objection of lack of procedural interest/documentary ineptitude (Art. 337, CPC), prejudicial defense on the merits asserting statute of limitations/prescription (Art. 487, II, CPC), and subsidiary merits defense. Principal counter-claim (Reconvenção) for damages only, omitting preliminary arguments because prescription extinguishes the suit automatically. Petição de Exceção de Incompetência followed by a separate autonomous action to declare the nullity of the debt. Embargos à Execução addressed to the distributor judge, requesting immediate suspension without filing a defense.

Correct Answer:

Access more questions from this quiz

Continue to OAB 2a Fase Practice Questions - OAB Exame de Ordem Unificado - 2a Fase (Prova Prático-Profissional) Exam for more practice questions and the full quiz experience.

Access More Questions