MN Bar Practice Questions - Minnesota Bar Examination Exam

Access More Questions

Officers obtain a warrant supported by probable cause but later discover a minor, good-faith error in the supporting affidavit. The defendant moves to suppress. Which doctrine may allow the evidence to be admitted?

The exclusionary rule, which always requires suppression The good-faith exception under United States v. Leon, when officers reasonably relied on a facially valid warrant The plain-view doctrine The inevitable-discovery doctrine, which requires no warrant at all

Correct Answer:

The good-faith exception under United States v. Leon, when officers reasonably relied on a facially valid warrant

Access more questions from this quiz

Continue to MN Bar Practice Questions - Minnesota Bar Examination Exam for more practice questions and the full quiz experience.

Access More Questions