MI Bar Practice Questions - Michigan Bar Examination Exam

Access More Questions

A federal plaintiff asserts a state-law claim that does not satisfy diversity but arises from the same case or controversy as a federal-question claim properly before the court. Which doctrine allows the court to hear the state claim?

Removal jurisdiction Diversity jurisdiction under § 1332 Supplemental jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1367 Pendent appellate jurisdiction

Correct Answer:

Supplemental jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1367

Access more questions from this quiz

Continue to MI Bar Practice Questions - Michigan Bar Examination Exam for more practice questions and the full quiz experience.

Access More Questions