Fachanwalt SAV Strafrecht Practice Questions - Fachanwalt SAV Strafrecht Avocat Spécialiste FSA En Droit Pénal Exam

Access More Questions
In landmark jurisprudence regarding the boundary between conditional intent (Eventualvorsatz) and conscious negligence (bewusste Fahrlässigkeit, e.g., BGE 133 IV 9, BGE 130 IV 58), what is the decisive criterion established by the Swiss Federal Supreme Court (Bundesgericht)?
Correct Answer:
Whether the perpetrator reconciled themselves with the realization of the statutory elements (*Inkaufnahme*) or whether they genuinely and trustingly relied on the outcome not occurring (*Vertrauen auf das Ausbleiben des Erfolgs*).

Access more questions from this quiz

Continue to Fachanwalt SAV Strafrecht Practice Questions - Fachanwalt SAV Strafrecht Avocat spécialiste FSA en droit pénal Exam for more practice questions and the full quiz experience.

Access More Questions