Categories
All Categories
DMV
ServSafe
OSHA
NCLEX
HESI
TEAS
ATI Nursing
CNA & Nurse Aide
NREMT & EMS
ACLS
BLS
CPR
Quizzes
Study Guides
Flashcards
Packages
0
Log In
Register
Categories
All Categories
DMV
ServSafe
OSHA
NCLEX
HESI
TEAS
Quizzes
Study Guides
Flashcards
Packages
Contact
Cart
0
Log In
Register
Luiss Master's Admission Test Practice Questions - Luiss Admission Test For Master's Degree Courses (Luiss Guido Carli University) Exam
Helpsheet
×
Helpsheet
×
Report question problem
×
I think the answer is wrong
There are multiple correct answers
There is a typing error
Image or comprehension text is not display properly
Something else(please specify below)
Any more information
Question Number 1
Premise 1: All compliance officers must audit quarterly financial reports. Premise 2: Marco is a compliance officer. Conclusion: Marco must audit quarterly financial reports. Which of the following best describes the logical validity of the statement above?
The argument is deductively valid because the conclusion follows necessarily from the premises.
The argument is invalid because Marco might be on medical leave during the audit.
The argument is inductive because it relies on Marco's specific job description.
The argument commits the fallacy of affirming the consequent.
✔ Correct Answer:
The argument is deductively valid because the conclusion follows necessarily from the premises.
Count Down:
Related questions :
